The Sports Ahmedabad Conclave, held in Ahmedabad on January 9, 2026, may well be remembered as a turning point in India’s sporting administration.
Attended by Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, Gujarat Deputy Chief Minister Harsh Sanghavi, and Sports Secretary Hari Ranjan Rao, the conclave was not about ceremonial speeches or broad promises. Instead, it delivered a blunt message to India’s sporting ecosystem: the era of administrative complacency is over.
At the centre of the discussions was a prime minister-approved 10-year medal roadmap, aligned with India’s ambition to become a top-10 sporting nation by the 2036 Olympic Games. But unlike previous cycles, the emphasis this time was not just on athletes—it was firmly on governance, accountability, and professionalism.
Ending the Culture of Administrative Absenteeism
One of the strongest signals from Ahmedabad was the government’s zero tolerance for officials treating multi-sport events as personal excursions. Sports Secretary Hari Ranjan Rao’s remarks were unusually direct: administrators who attend events but remain unavailable to athletes, or travel with relatives, are no longer welcome in Indian contingents.
This stance is rooted in repeated historical failures. From the Rio 2016 Olympics, where Indian officials were reprimanded for unruly behavior and poor accreditation discipline, to the 2025 World University Games, where six Indian badminton players were barred from competing due to a registration lapse, the pattern has been clear—administrative errors have directly harmed athletes’ careers. The conclave framed these not as isolated incidents, but as systemic flaws that must be eradicated.
Read Articles Without Ads On Your IndiaSportsHub App. Download Now And Stay Updated
To enforce this shift, strict timelines have been laid down for the 2026 Asian Games in Aichi–Nagoya. Federations must submit final lists by January 15, ahead of the Japanese organizers’ January 30 deadline. The messaging is deliberate: Japan’s uncompromising organisational culture will not accommodate Indian inefficiency.
A Data-Driven Medal Roadmap
The conclave also outlined India’s most quantifiable Olympic vision to date. The targets are ambitious but specific:
- 2036 Olympics: 12–14 gold medals, 30–35 total medals, top-10 finish
- 2048 Olympics: 35–40 gold medals, close to 100 total medals, top-5 contention
Crucially, officials acknowledged that India’s problem is not just performance but participation depth. While nations like the USA and China field 400–600 athletes at the Olympics, India’s contingent remains comparatively small. Expanding presence across medal-rich sports is now a strategic priority.
Borrowing lessons from China’s Project 119, India plans to invest heavily in disciplines like athletics, swimming, rowing, kayaking, and sailing sports that offer multiple medal opportunities but require long-term, science-backed development rather than short-term results.
The 2026 Asian Games have been identified as the first major checkpoint for this new system. After winning 106 medals at Hangzhou, India has set a target of 111 medals in Aichi–Nagoya. Unlike past editions, selection will be governed by strict performance benchmarks. Only athletes with a realistic chance of top-eight finishes in Asia will be considered, effectively ending the practice of sending “exposure” entries to inflate participation numbers.
In contrast, expectations for the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow are far more muted. With the event reduced to just 10 sports due to budget constraints, several disciplines where India traditionally excels—wrestling, shooting, badminton, hockey, and table tennis—have been excluded. As a result, India’s medal expectations have been revised downward to around 20–22 medals, highlighting how global event structures can significantly impact national performance narratives.
National Sports Policy 2025: The Structural Backbone
The conclave also reinforced the importance of the National Sports Policy (NSP) 2025, which replaces the outdated 2001 framework. The policy rests on five pillars: global excellence, economic development, social inclusion, mass participation, and integration with education.
For elite sport, the key shift lies in professionalizing federations. Administrators are now expected to act as vision builders, delegating daily operations to trained professionals. Coaching reforms proposed by the Pullela Gopichand Committee, including tiered certification systems, aim to ensure that athletes at every level are guided by qualified personnel.
Read Articles Without Ads On Your IndiaSportsHub App. Download Now And Stay Updated
Perhaps the most telling aspect of the Ahmedabad conclave was its tone. This was not about celebrating future success but about fixing uncomfortable truths poor medical support, bloated contingents, opaque selections, and lack of accountability. The introduction of AI-driven talent identification, stricter doping oversight, and even cultural training for athletes and officials travelling to Japan underlines how granular the new approach has become.
In essence, India’s sporting reset is no longer aspirational; it is procedural. The real test will come not in policy documents, but in execution at events like the 2026 Asian Games and, ultimately, the 2036 Olympics. For now, Ahmedabad has made one thing clear: Indian sport is being redefined as a professional, athlete-first enterprise, not a ceremonial exercise.
