Indian taekwondo has quietly produced one of the most compelling sporting turnarounds of the year.
Long trapped in a cycle of administrative paralysis and missed opportunities, the sport has finally begun to translate raw talent into tangible international success. The results of 2025 mark not just an improvement, but a genuine inflection point one that positions taekwondo as arguably India’s most improved individual sport in the current high-performance landscape .
For decades, Indian taekwondo existed on the fringes of the country’s combat-sports ecosystem, overshadowed by wrestling and boxing. Its last significant continental breakthrough came in 2002 at the Asian Games in Busan, when a 17-year-old Surendra Bhandari claimed bronze in the flyweight category under extraordinary circumstances.
With no official clearance from the Indian government, Bhandari trained privately under Korean experts and still managed to defeat opponents from Nepal and Yemen before falling to Iran’s Behzad Khodadad. That medal, remarkable as it was, remained an isolated moment rather than a foundation.
What followed was a prolonged period of stagnation. India’s presence at major Asian and world events became irregular, hamstrung by the absence of a unified governing structure and a coherent high-performance roadmap. The crisis peaked at the Hangzhou Asian Games, where India fielded no taekwondo athletes at all not due to lack of talent, but because of a damaging jurisdictional conflict between the Taekwondo Federation of India (TFI) and India Taekwondo (IT). Athletes such as Shivansh Tyagi and Rupa Bayor trained for months, only to be excluded due to administrative deadlock, even after court intervention.
The true breakthrough of 2025 has been defined by results that could no longer be ignored. Nitesh Singh Bisht emerged as the face of this renaissance after becoming the first Indian to win gold at a G2-ranked international tournament the Australian Open competing in the men’s 63 kg category. G2 events carry significant ranking weight and attract elite global fields, making Bisht’s triumph a landmark moment for Indian taekwondo.
Read Articles Without Ads On Your IndiaSportsHub App. Download Now And Stay Updated
Bisht followed that with a bronze medal at the inaugural World Taekwondo Under-21 Championships in Nairobi, demonstrating consistency across age categories and competitive contexts. His technical maturity particularly his control under the Protective Scoring System (PSS), distance management, and counter-attacking efficiency reflected a level of tactical sophistication rarely seen from Indian athletes on this stage.
If Bisht symbolised consistency, Ankit Mer delivered the year’s most disruptive result. Competing in the 54 kg category at the same U21 Worlds, Mer defeated reigning senior world champion Seo Eun-sou of South Korea an outcome that would have been unthinkable for Indian taekwondo just a few years ago. South Korea’s dominance in this weight class has been near absolute, and Mer’s run to the silver medal, which included victories over multiple top-ranked opponents, marked India’s first double-podium finish at a global taekwondo event.
These results suggest something deeper than isolated success. Indian athletes are no longer psychologically overawed by traditional powerhouses like South Korea, Iran, and Turkey. At the U21 level especially, the competitive gap has narrowed to a point where tactical execution, not reputation, is deciding outcomes.
Read Articles Without Ads On Your IndiaSportsHub App. Download Now And Stay Updated
The transformation has been underpinned by more advanced training methodologies. Modern taekwondo demands explosive lower-body power, elite reaction time, and precise engagement with electronic scoring systems. Indian programmes have begun to incorporate plyometric training, reaction-based drills, and PSS-specific tactics shifting away from outdated, strength-heavy models that struggled under modern rulesets.
Equally significant has been the decentralization of talent. The Northeast has emerged as a major contributor, with athletes from Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, and Nagaland forming a growing talent base. Women athletes like Rodali Barua and Rupa Bayor have ended India’s continental medal drought and delivered consistent performances at G2 events. Much of this progress has been driven by private academies and international coaching exposure, rather than state-run systems.
However, the sport’s greatest contradiction remains governance. In May 2025, the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports recognized India Taekwondo as the sole national governing body, aligning domestic administration with World Taekwondo. While this resolved eligibility issues, it also placed the sport under leadership clouded by serious financial and ethical allegations. FIRs, audit failures, and unresolved ethics committee recommendations continue to cast a shadow over administration creating a dangerous disconnect between athlete excellence and institutional credibility.
Commercially, the launch of the Taekwondo Premier League represents a step toward professionalization, offering athletes visibility and income beyond government support. But for sustained international success, commercial platforms must align technically with global standards, particularly in officiating and scoring systems.
Looking ahead, the 2026 Asian Games in Nagoya loom large. With stricter selection benchmarks and reduced quotas, India must build depth across weight categories rather than relying on a handful of stars. The early success at the U21 level offers hope not just for Nagoya, but for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics cycle.
Indian taekwondo has finally moved from potential to proof. Whether this renaissance becomes a lasting era will depend not on talent, which has already arrived, but on whether governance and infrastructure can rise to meet the standard set by athletes on the mat.
